On 05 Dec 13:54, Mathias Behrle wrote: > * Cédric Krier: " Re: [tryton] RfC: maning of new state of stock move" (Fri, 5 > Dec 2014 13:17:03 +0100): > > > On 05 Dec 12:34, Mathias Behrle wrote: > > > * Cédric Krier: " Re: [tryton] RfC: maning of new state of stock > > > move" (Fri, 5 Dec 2014 12:07:54 +0100): > > > > > > > On 05 Dec 11:57, Mathias Behrle wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > I would like to pull a little bit of your attention to the following > > > > > issue: > > > > > > > > > > For [1] there is coming a new state for stock moves, for which the > > > > > current proposal [2] is 'None'. > > > > > > > > > > My point of view is: there shouldn't be a state of None. As soon as an > > > > > object has a state, it has one and 'None' is misleading. This is > > > > > different from selections, where you can can make a selection or not. > > > > > > > > I don't understand this thought. > > > > state field can only have one of the value of the selection so there is > > > > no misleading by naming one of the selection 'None'. > > > > > > A state of 'None' logically is not at all a state , > > > > For me this is wrong, it is a state. > > > > > so if choosen the state > > > should disappear from the object. > > > > I don't understand. > > If you choose to set a state to 'None', you could expect to remove it.
To remove what? > > > It would be way easier for our users to have a meaningful name instead of > > > a > > > logical clash. > > > > What best meaning that the move has no state because it has a state that > > does nothing. > > So give it a meaningful name describing its purpose: > > 'Preliminary', 'Preparative', 'Provisional', 'Tentative' All sounds like for the current 'Draft'. > > > A selection is different. Not doing a selection is an empty selection. > > > > Wrong. This is not how Tryton works. If there is not a selection entry > > for 'Empty', it is not possible to not select something. > > It is logic for selections to contain an empty item, if the selection is not > required. False assumption. > It is not logic for a state to be not a state, Who says it is not a state? > because as soon as > something is in a state, it has one, but not none. There is always something in a field. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgppeelVIdsf3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
