On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Henri Yandell wrote: > This is fine. The problem for Jakarta is that the Maven generated websites > do not fit the existing L&F. Downloads, sibling projects, general info are > all missing or setup in different ways.
The problem for Jakarta is that there is no existing look and feel. Compare: http://jakarta.apache.org/ http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/ http://jakarta.apache.org/poi/ > If all of Jakarta were to be mandated to be built in the same way etc, > Forrest would be the way to go. That seems kind of arbitrary to me. The current Maven document generator produces a website that has a consistent look and feel, as well as a standard way of organizing the important project information. On every Maven generated site, for instance, I always know exactly where to go to get to the CVS repo information. Until Forrest has at least reached that point, I don't see why we would want to use it. -Kurt -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
