On 24 Jan 2003, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 02:55, Henri Yandell wrote: > > I'm not so bothered by who uses Maven, but by who is using Maven for their > > websites. The L&F and structure is different to the primary top level > > Jakarta site. > > > > My only question here is: Should I push this on general@jakarta, or > > initially at maven@jakarta? > > We should certainly formalize a proposal and possibly a demo site before > going to general. There's nothing more I would like than to see Maven > used Jakarta wide but I'm not going to hold my breath. I'm also not > going to push the issue. But if you want to lead the way with a proposal > then that's great! Go for it! Just to underline a point in other replies. While I think this will help Maven be used Jakarta wide, I'm more interested in making those places that use Maven in Jakarta fit into the overall structure. > > Does anyone here agree with me? and are there any features of the Maven > > site generation which would help? > > > > Ability to use an inherited navigation bar.. or some kind of checker etc. > > I'm sure we could make an example in short order that would demonstrate > Maven's usefulness. What I'm hoping for is some kind of standard template website/nav-bar that Maven projects in Jakarta could use for their site. ie) adding a Download Release, Download Nightly, and other Jakarta menu items. So, not so much the Jakarta Commons site you created back in July, but a way to improve the various Commons subprojects using Maven to have a consistent L&F. Hen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
