Hi Thomas, I'm still using t 2.4 extensively and without any burning need to patch it :-)
I would still like to find the time to fix the Avalon stuff, but it is working for me at present and I still have two concurrent projects I am working on (both based on t2.4) and which are taking all my time. I have written an alternative page layout framework to replace the scripting approach used by the velocity service. I am using this for one of my projects and experimenting with a couple of different approaches. When I am further along this could be a future fulcrum component. As far as I am concerned Turbine 2.4 continues to be the framework of choice. Regards, Peter On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 11:51 +0100, Thomas UNG wrote: > Hi Henning, Thomas and Peter, > > In recent conversation in the turbine user mailing list, we've talked > about documentation and in particular doc for migrating 2.3 to 2.4. Some > folks and I would like to have more info on this because we all > appreciate the framework. I saw in JIRA that you are assigned to some > issues, that is the reason why I write to you guys directly and I think > that you know beter that anyone else. > > Here are the questions: > > - Is 2.4 in scope? Can you communicate any schedule/milestones? If we > have a clear view on this, some people in this mailing list (me in > particular) could help. > > - What are scheduled for 2.4? Where are we? 2.4M1, M2? > Is the M1 list accurate? > http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/turbine/turbine-2.4-M1/changes-report.html > Is there any other items? > > - In the jira issue tracker, how can we identify issues related to 2.4? > I can see only these components: Core, Fulcrum, META, Site and Turbine 2.3. > > Thanks in advance for your answers, > Best regards, > Thomas UNG > -- -------------------- Peter Courcoux Mobile: 07880 605626 -------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
