Peter Courcoux wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Personally I think t 2.4 is the better way to go. The pipeline is more > flexible and moving services from the main turbine source tree to > fulcrum is a step forward.
Hi Peter, as you use Turbine 2.4M1 in projects, I'm interested in your experiences with the Fulcrum components. IMO some of them are not at the same level of functionality and quality as their Turbine 2.3 counterparts. What do you think? Which of them do you use? What components are missing? Bye, Thomas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
