Hi Peter, Thanks in advance for your help. I will try first to research by my self and look at the docs. If I got some difficulties, I will put my questions in this mailing list.
Kind regards, Thomas ---------- Initial Header ----------- From : Peter Courcoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To : Turbine Users List <turbine-user@jakarta.apache.org> Cc : Date : Thu, 30 Nov 2006 23:51:27 +0000 Subject : Re: Doc to promote turbine Hi Thomas, Personally I think t 2.4 is the better way to go. The pipeline is more flexible and moving services from the main turbine source tree to fulcrum is a step forward. If you decide to go this route I will try to help answer any queries on the mailing list. It is a long time since I made that transition, and I really cannot remember how much of a problem it was, so I guess that it couldn't have been too painful. Regards, Peter On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 23:45 +0100, Thomas UNG wrote: > Peter, > > >From the beginning, I thought that 2.3.2 was the stable version, the > version starting a project based on a release version of the Turbine > framework ? > > Now that I am pretty familiar with 2.3.2, do you thing that I should go > to 2.4M1, is this stable and easy to migrate? > > Thanks a lot, > Thomas > > * Turbine 2.3.2 is the version you should use when either migrating > from an older version of Turbine or starting a project based on a > release version of the Turbine framework. > * Turbine 2.4 is the shape of things to come. Turbine 2.4 is using > next generation technologies like an Avalon-based container and > decoupled components from the Fulcrum sister project of Turbine. If you > don't mind building your own jars from the Subversion tree and can > tolerate the occasional change while developing on the framework, you > should use this version of Turbine. > > > Peter Courcoux a écrit : > > Hi Thomas, > > > > I'm still using t 2.4 extensively and without any burning need to patch > > it :-) > > > > I would still like to find the time to fix the Avalon stuff, but it is > > working for me at present and I still have two concurrent projects I am > > working on (both based on t2.4) and which are taking all my time. > > > > I have written an alternative page layout framework to replace the > > scripting approach used by the velocity service. I am using this for one > > of my projects and experimenting with a couple of different approaches. > > When I am further along this could be a future fulcrum component. > > > > As far as I am concerned Turbine 2.4 continues to be the framework of > > choice. > > > > Regards, > > > > Peter > > > > On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 11:51 +0100, Thomas UNG wrote: > >> Hi Henning, Thomas and Peter, > >> > >> In recent conversation in the turbine user mailing list, we've talked > >> about documentation and in particular doc for migrating 2.3 to 2.4. Some > >> folks and I would like to have more info on this because we all > >> appreciate the framework. I saw in JIRA that you are assigned to some > >> issues, that is the reason why I write to you guys directly and I think > >> that you know beter that anyone else. > >> > >> Here are the questions: > >> > >> - Is 2.4 in scope? Can you communicate any schedule/milestones? If we > >> have a clear view on this, some people in this mailing list (me in > >> particular) could help. > >> > >> - What are scheduled for 2.4? Where are we? 2.4M1, M2? > >> Is the M1 list accurate? > >> http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/turbine/turbine-2.4-M1/changes-report.html > >> Is there any other items? > >> > >> - In the jira issue tracker, how can we identify issues related to 2.4? > >> I can see only these components: Core, Fulcrum, META, Site and Turbine 2.3. > >> > >> Thanks in advance for your answers, > >> Best regards, > >> Thomas UNG > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- -------------------- Peter Courcoux Mobile: 07880 605626 -------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------- ALICE SECURITE ENFANTS --------------------- Protégez vos enfants des dangers d'Internet en installant Sécurité Enfants, le contrôle parental d'Alice. http://www.aliceadsl.fr/securitepc/default_copa.asp --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
