Am 25.01.2011 14:42, schrieb Tamas Hegedus: > E.g. I would not worry about TG2 w/o a maintainer if I knew that I can > continue developing using the current TG2 and I will be able to use TG3 > w/o any extra work or loss of some functionality when TG3 is released.
I think you misunderstand the idea of TG3. It's to build something new based on Pyramid that is in the spirit of TG and so that TG projects can be easily migrated, but not to create something that 100% emulates TG2 with all of its quirks and peculiarities so you don't have *any* extra work. That would not make much sense since it would be easier to continue maintaining TG2 then. -- Christoph -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.
