For me the vote said it all; its good to go to switch. I think I can
understand your position and probably would side with you if it wasn't
for two things: We have a release so users just wanting to understand
SCA and the basics of Tuscany have something stable to work with. Also
this is just a switch, the head of the trunk should be preserved in a
branch. Just before the switch I would recommend both have tags too.
Doing this doesn't stop any discussion, it doesn't stop bringing
function/code from the current head back in to Chianti; it even doesn't
prevent in the case community decides we prefer to switch back.
Simon Nash wrote:
Jeremy,
Before you do this, I'd prefer to see some discussion about the
functional differences between chianti and the current trunk code
and how we would see these being addressed, as I said in my
previous email on this subject. What do you (or others) think
about this?
Simon
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
With the vote in favour of switching, I am about to start moving
chianti into trunk. I will move the current sca parts into a branch
(branches/pre-chianti) and move the chianti code into trunk. I will
make the version in the poms 1.0-SNAPSHOT like the SDO tree.
I expect to complete this tomorrow or possibly Wed if there are
build issues. If anyone has a bunch of uncommitted changes or a big
patch for submission please speak up soon to avoid merge issues.
Thanks
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
