Hi,
I have checked in the changes.
To Sebastien's questions:
1) Yes, we can start to take advantage of @BeforeClass, @AfterClass
annotations. But don't forget to fix the memory leaks :-).
2) When I try to port the SCATestCaseRunner to support JUnit 4.x
annotations, I found it fairly cumbersome to use java reflection to access
org.junit.* classes and annotations. Can we add JUnit as a compile time
dependency? If we don't like to have it in the core, maybe we should keep it
in the "tuscany-test" module.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 7:56 PM
Subject: Re: [sca-java-integration-branch] Moving to maven-surefire-plugin
2.3 and JUnit 4.2
Luciano Resende wrote:
+1, Thanks for volunteering !
On 3/7/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
With the release of maven-surefire-plugin 2.3, we can now run JUnit
4.xtest cases under maven. I plan to update
pom.xml(s) in the sca-java-integration branch to take advantage of this
capability. I have run the full top-down build and everything looks
good.
Please let me know if you have any concerns.
Thanks,
Raymond
+1 from me.
A side comment, this will give us the ability to init a single runtime
instance in a method annotated with a Junit @BeforeClass annotation and
reuse it across multiple test methods. I think it will be interesting for
integration tests in particular.
Raymond, are you going to also adjust the SCATestCaseRunner utility class
to support JUnit4 test cases? or I can help port that class if you prefer,
let me know.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
