Jeremy, I'd like to see some progress on the community front! Let's see this approach agreed upon and fleshed out a bit more.
thanks, dims On 3/22/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 22, 2007, at 12:31 PM, Simon Laws wrote: > Jeremy. This sounds like a simpler approach than what is there now. > I like > the idea but a question. > > 1) move everything that does not logical depend on > org.apache.tuscany:sca:1.0-incubating to contrib > > from your previous definition do you mean those things that are not > considered to be independent. Or do you mean things that could be > independent but just aren't packaged that way now. I assume that > you mean > the latter as your next point is to go ahead and make them > independent. Yes things aren't really independent due to the intermediate poms in the physical directory tree. > > Also is the global parent version 1.0-incubating or 1.0-incubating- > SNAPSHOT. > I note that now you have it without SNAPSHOT but its children with > SNAPSHOT. > Are you just saying that the global parent doesn't get packaged/ > released > per-se SNAPSHOT or not. This is the pom defined in the tag here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/pom/ sca/1.0-incubating which is a stable artifact - one we have voted to release but are waiting for the IPMC to approve. It will not move. [[ BIG NAG TO OUR MENTORS, PLEASE CAN YOU HELP BY VOTING ON THIS THREAD]] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/ 200703.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] The things in trunk are not stable and so have a SNAPSHOT version. -- Jeremy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
