I have expressed my views on all modules sharing the same version and a top
down build in quite a bit of detail in my previous emails on the same
subject. Unfortunately, I will have to vote -1 on this.
Meeraj
From: Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Use single version for all Java/SCA modules and enable
building all modules together
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:19:53 -0700
On Mar 28, 2007, at 12:51 AM, ant elder wrote:
Here's the vote on this I said [1] I'd start to get closure on this
issue.
The proposal is to have top-level pom for the Java SCA project that
enables
building all the modules together - kernel, services, runtimes,
extensions
etc, and for that to work all those modules need to use the same version
name.
Here's my +1.
...ant
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/ msg16024.html
There has been no proposal for how to resolve the issue about building
extensions using multiple versions of kernel and how modules on different
release schedules requiring different levels of kernel or plugins will be
handled.
Until we can come up with a solution for these issues, I feel I have to
vote against the proposal.
-1
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
Match.com - Click Here To Find Singles In Your Area Today!
http://msnuk.match.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
