Hi, Bert.
I think I'm with you on the proposal. The rule of the game should be very
simple as follows:
Let's agree on a set of modules that are supposed to work together for the
next target (a release or a demo), then define an assembly and pom.xml to
enforce the cohesions.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bert Lamb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Use single version for all Java/SCA modules and enable
building all modules together
Would something like what I outlined in this email[1] be more amenable
to people voting against this proposal?
-Bert
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg16062.html
On 3/28/07, Meeraj Kunnumpurath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have expressed my views on all modules sharing the same version and a
top
down build in quite a bit of detail in my previous emails on the same
subject. Unfortunately, I will have to vote -1 on this.
Meeraj
>From: Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
>To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Use single version for all Java/SCA modules and
>enable
>building all modules together
>Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:19:53 -0700
>
>
>On Mar 28, 2007, at 12:51 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
>>Here's the vote on this I said [1] I'd start to get closure on this
>>issue.
>>
>>The proposal is to have top-level pom for the Java SCA project that
>>enables
>>building all the modules together - kernel, services, runtimes,
>>extensions
>>etc, and for that to work all those modules need to use the same
>>version
>>name.
>>
>>Here's my +1.
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>>[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/
>>msg16024.html
>
>
>
>There has been no proposal for how to resolve the issue about building
>extensions using multiple versions of kernel and how modules on
>different
>release schedules requiring different levels of kernel or plugins will
>be
>handled.
>
>Until we can come up with a solution for these issues, I feel I have to
>vote against the proposal.
>
>-1
>
>Jim
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________________________________________
Match.com - Click Here To Find Singles In Your Area Today!
http://msnuk.match.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
