Comments inline.
----- Original Message -----
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: Release management for next release, was: SCA 0.92 release?
On 8/7/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
> On 6/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> With the SCA 0.91 release now being voted on how about starting on
>> 0.92
?
>>
>> I've already been adding some things I'm interested in getting done to
the
>> next release wiki page -
>>
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Java+SCA+Next+Release+Contents-so
far thats mainly related to improving web services functionality.
>>
>> So anyone else interested in helping with an 0.92 release or have any
>> function they'd like to suggest or add to the wiki page? How does
aiming for
>> getting it done 4 - 6 weeks again sound?
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>>
>>
> Bringing this thread up again as time is ticking on if we want to get a
> release out this month. How would people feel about taking a branch for
this
> release in a bit less than 2 weeks, say aiming for the 14/15th of
August?
> That should just about give enough time for clean up and voting to get
> a
> release out by the end of August.
>
Ant,
Thanks for reminding us that time is ticking if we want to get another
release out this month :) I'd like to nominate you as release manager,
if you're ok with it.
Thoughts?
--
Jean-Sebastien
Yes I'm ok with it, thanks for all the support. So any advance on the name
being 0.95 and the branch being cut end of next week?
Thank you for take the responsibility. I believe we are all behind you if
you need any help :-).
For the release name, I think it should be a 1.0 as discussed on the thread
that Sebastien started.
Cutting a branch by the end of next week may be too short to contain all the
features we desire to have in the 1.0 release. I suggest two options to be
explored:
1) Try the maven-release-plugin in sandbox to better understand how it can
help reduce the overhead of releasing.
2) We could branch for the 1.0 release to contain the candidate modules and
keep doing 1.0 developement in the branch and merge them into the trunk. I'm
not sure how feasible it is.
Thanks,
Raymond
...ant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
