Simon Laws wrote:
On 8/16/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am not referencing this class directly in my code.  Can it be that the
published 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT jars in maven repos are not in syc or
not
the latest??  I can not think of other possibilities.

Vamsi


On 8/14/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/14/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/11/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,

We put together a demo [1] on Tuscany/Geronimo integration for the
LinuxWorld 2007. You are welcome to play with it and give us
feedback.
Please follow the instructions at


http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/rfeng/geronimo-demo/README.TXT
.
The demo scenario is captured at


http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/rfeng/geronimo-demo/scenario.png
.

The demo is built on top of the sandbox code in Geronimo [2] which
is
discussed on [3].

Please note this is just the starting of effort and there are still
quite
a
lot to do. Please join us on this effort.

In the near term, I believe that we need to do the following:

1) Move the code out of sandbox and have them in the build with test
cases.
2) The tuscany-geronimo-plugin uses mixed versions of Tuscany Java
SCA
0.91-incubating and 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT. Let's try to switch to
1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT so that we have consistent modules.
After switching to 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT, I have run into a
NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/tuscany/sca/assembly/DefaultSCABindingFactory.


3) The Geronimo 2.0 RC1 is not being voted on. We should be prepared
to
move
this level. Vamsi, do you have the JIRA GERONIMO-3351 [4] fixed in
the
RC1?
GERONIMO-3351 has not been integrated into 2.0 release.  Part of the
problem
is addressed in branches\2.0 and trunk.  It affects only SNAPSHOT
dependencies and there is some discussion on whether the downloaded
version
(if it is different from SNAPSHOT) should be renamed, by the plugin
installer, to SNAPSHOT or the dependency resolution is Geronimo should
handle it in a different way.  The problem we have run into is in
conjunction with another problem that occurs when a trailing "/" is
not
present in the maven repo URL.  This has been fixed in branches\2.0
and
trunk (not in 2.0 release though) and the work around for this is to
put
that trailing "/" in the maven repo URLs in geronimo-plugin.xml
.  These
two
fixes will (most likely, but not guaranteed) go into 2.0.1 due to be
released soon (probably this week).


[1]
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/rfeng/geronimo-demo/
[2]
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/tuscany-integration/
[3]


http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Tuscany+Geronimo+Integration
[4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3351

Thanks,
Raymond





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hi

org/apache/tuscany/sca/assembly/DefaultSCABindingFactory. was taken out
a
week or so ago when I moved the majority of sca binding into the
binding-sca
module. I'm thinking that I was a little overzealous when I took this
out
and that it probably needs to go back in.  In the mean time can you
create
a


org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.sca.impl.SCABindingFactoryImpl

instead?

Regards

Simon

You may very well be right. Time to push some new snapshots out! Let me find
out how to do that.

Simon


Yes I think that new published snapshots will resolve that issue.

In addition, how about adding the Tuscany/Geronimo integration modules to our build? This will help us check that we're not breaking them when we make changes in the rest of the Tuscany code. It will also make it easier for people to try out the integration from their Tuscany workspace / development environment.

The simplest is probably to point to these modules in the Geronimo sandbox SVN from our java/sca/modules directory using an SVN externals property...

Thoughts?

--
Jean-Sebastien


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to