Yes, SimpleJavaType2Node does this.
Raymond, do you think it would be better to use the same QName for the dummy
element:
{"http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/sca/databinding/dom/1.0";, "root"}
or a different one, scoped to the Axiom DB?
Scott
On 10/3/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In a short answer, yes. We should try to create a dummy element in such
> case. I believe we already do that for DOM. Do you want to provide a patch
> :-)?
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Kurz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 7:53 PM
> Subject: could databinding-axiom Object2OMElement construct a default
> elem?
>
>
> >I noticed that if I try to use the XMLStreamReader databinding at the end
> >of
> > a chain starting with the SimpleJavaDB, I end up in the following
> > transform
> > chain:
> >
> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.databinding.axiom.Object2OMElement,
> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.databinding.axiom.OMElement2XMLStreamReader
> >
> > This will give an NPE in the case that the logical type is an XMLType
> with
> > a
> > Type but no Element. (Roughly speaking, this will be the case if my
> > simple type doesn't
> > correspond to some XSD/WSDL definition).
> >
> > I can't say I really grasp what's involved in creating a default element
> > name... but that's what we do in SimpleJavaType2Node.
> >
> > Is there a reason we can't do the same? Otherwise this
> Object2OMElement
> > transformer ends up causing some problems I'd say.
> >
> > Scott
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
