Hi,
Thank you for participating the discussion. I collected all the input we
have so far at the following WIKI page:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Roadmap+Discussion
Please feel free to add/update to make it an ongoing community effect.
Hopefully we can start to turn them into actions and I believe some specific
discussions have been carried on the ML. As always, your contributions are
welcome.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "wang feng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Tuscany SCA Roadmap and next releases
Hi all,
We have used Tuscany 1.0 in our product and found some features is
important to us.
- Support hot deployable on contribution and composite.
This should be have a recursive algorithm to update the correlated
component when it has been referenced.
- Support SDO namespace when using websservice.
Deploy a service to webservice,a schema file used in SDO and have sdo
namespace such as commonj.sdo/java or commonj.sdo/xml,we should support
the feature when parsing the wsdl.
- Support load contribution as a osgi bundle.
Thanks,
wangfeng
On 2007-10-17, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/16/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For implementation.bpel, we need to finalize support for references,
and we might want to do introspection of the BPEL process.
On 10/16/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
> ant elder wrote:
> >
> > - Fix nightly builds (looks like this may be going again now)
> >
>
> Yes it is.
>
>
http://vmbuild1.apache.org/continuum/buildResults.action?projectGroupId=19&projectId=277
>
> [snip]
> > - Fix all the build issues (maven 2.0.6/2.0.7/JDK6/empty repository)
so new
> > users building Tuscany have a good experience
> >
>
> After the changes I made last week I think this is now all fixed
> (except
> for JIRAs TUSCANY-1846 and TUSCANY-1847). I am currently building with
> Maven 2.0.7 and both JDK5 and JDK6.
>
> Could people please try other Maven combinations? 2.0.5, 2.0.6, and
> report any errors? Thanks.
>
> [snip]
> > - Get binding.jms and implementation.bpel more spec complete.
> > - For JMS maybe have a host-jms module so you don't have to start a
separate
> > JMS server or can use the the Geronimo one if thats where Tuscany is
running
> >
>
> What's missing in binding.jms and implementation.bpel? Could people
> working on these modules give a quick overview?
>
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For binding.jms the user guide shows you that most of the options still
need to be implemented.
http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java-bindingjms.html
There are a few people either working on this or have expressed an
interest
in working on it. There is quite a lot on incremental stuff that can be
done
for anyone else who is interested.
Regards
Simon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
