Simon, I don't have anything to add to the updated abstract. My whole goal was to make the first abstract a bit clearer and it seems like now it is there.
Thanks, Haleh On 10/17/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Patrick > > In lieu of Kelvin responding to this (I was going to help Kelvin out and > make the slides) I think it would be really good to have you be part of > the > presentation. It brings a slightly different perspective and broadens the > appeal I think. > > Regards > > Simon > > On 10/16/07, Patrick Leonard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Haleh, the abstract looks good. > > > > Kelvin, I would be happy to join you if you want to do the > > multi-presenter. > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: haleh mahbod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 1:08 PM > > To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org > > Subject: Re: ApacheCon Europe 2008 > > > > > > How about the following. The talk is in April and by then there might be > > other releases beyond release 1.0 which is emphasized in the original > > text. > > > > An update on Apache Tuscany project- Building SOA solutions is easy > > > > Apache Tuscany provides an open-source services infrastructure for > > constructing SOA solutions from heterogeneous and distributed > > services. This talk will focus on Apache Tuscany's implementation of > > Service Component Architecture which is based on V1.0 specification that > > is now > > under OASIS for standardization. In addition, the talk will cover Apache > > Tuscany > > added extensions such as web 2.0, scripting, distribution and > > multi-language support as well as integration with other Apache projects > > such as ODE and Geronimo. > > Some of the interesting topics that are under discussion in Apache > > Tuscany will be highlighted. > > > > The talk will be complemented with a demo to demonstrate how easy it is > > to use Apache Tuscany to develop SOA solutions. > > > > > > > > > > On 10/11/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 10/9/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > ApacheCon Europe is coming up, 7th to 11th of April 2008 [1], > > and the > > > deadline for submission of abstracts is coming up fast, on > > 26th of > > > this month. > > > > > > What should we aim to do here? > > > > > > The options seem to be > > > > > > (60 minutes) Multi-person panel discussion > > > (60 minutes) Normal presentation > > > Intensive topical training (full-day) > > > Intensive topical training (half-day) > > > Intensive topical training (two-day) > > > > > > My guess is that we should submit for a 60 minute > > presentation, but > > > should we go for a tutorial session as well? > > > > > > I'm happy to coordinate, and although presenting on SCA would > > take me > > > a little out of my comfort zone, I would welcome the chance to > > do so. > > > > > > As a possible starting point for thinking about this I was > > looking at > > > Simon Laws' abstract and presentation for the recent JavaZone > > > conference [2], [3]. What would we want to update or > > emphasize > > > differently from this? In the short term we just need to get > > an > > > abstract together and think about who will do the > > presentation. > > > > > > Regards, Kelvin. > > > > > > [1] http://www.eu.apachecon.com/ > > > [2] http://www4.java.no/web/show.do?page=92&articleid=5343 > > > [3] > > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/68184/BuildingSO > > AWithApacheTuscany.ppt?version=1 > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > I would certainly submit an abstract for a 60 minute > > presentation. I know > > others in the community have been working on tutorial material. > > What's the > > state of that? If that is going ahead then that material could > > be reused and > > a proposal made. Would be good to get more mileage out of it. > > > > Regards > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > >
