Simon Laws wrote:
[snip]
The model in my sandbox [2], which is very simlar to the XML that the
current contribution repository uses, now holds node and contribution name
information [3]. These could be two separate models to decouple the
management of contributions from the process of associating them together.
I like the decoupling part:
- A workspace containing contributions (basically just a contribution
URI -> URL association). I've started to add that Workspace interface to
the contribution package.
- A description of the network containing nodes, we don't need a new
model for that, as we already have implementation-node and can use
something like:
<composite name="bobsNetWork">
<component name="bobsNode1">
<implementation.node ...>
</component>
<component name="bobsNode2">
<implementation.node ...>
</component>
</composite>
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
