Mark Combellack wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking through the Tuscany source code and noticed that some
files have a @version containing the SVN revision number in their JavaDoc
headers but others do not.
As an example, @version might look like:
/**
* Some JavaDoc for the class
*
* @version $Rev: 598005 $ $Date: 2007-11-25 16:36:27 +0000 (Sun, 25 Nov
2007) $
*/
I would like to go through the Tuscany source code and add this header where
it is missing. This would involve a large number of minor changes to the
Tuscany tree so I wanted to run it by everyone to make sure no-one had a
problem with me doing this at this time.
I'll probably start this next week unless there is an objection.
Thanks,
Mark
I'm replying again to the original message in this thread, as there
doesn't seem to be any conclusion yet. Does anybody understand where we
are with this?
I'm usually adding the SVN rev tag to the files I touch when I see that
it's missing. I guess I can continue like that but it doesn't sound
ideal, so I'm still +1 on Mark's proposal.
Anyway, Mark Thanks for volunteering to do this. I was hoping it'd take
less than 3 weeks to reach consensus on changes like that which don't
break anything...
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
