> -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 15 April 2008 02:59 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Adding SVN version to Java files > > Mark Combellack wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been looking through the Tuscany source code and noticed that some > > files have a @version containing the SVN revision number in their > JavaDoc > > headers but others do not. > > > > As an example, @version might look like: > > > > /** > > * Some JavaDoc for the class > > * > > * @version $Rev: 598005 $ $Date: 2007-11-25 16:36:27 +0000 (Sun, 25 Nov > > 2007) $ > > */ > > > > I would like to go through the Tuscany source code and add this header > where > > it is missing. This would involve a large number of minor changes to the > > Tuscany tree so I wanted to run it by everyone to make sure no-one had a > > problem with me doing this at this time. > > > > I'll probably start this next week unless there is an objection. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mark > > > > > > I'm replying again to the original message in this thread, as there > doesn't seem to be any conclusion yet. Does anybody understand where we > are with this? > > I'm usually adding the SVN rev tag to the files I touch when I see that > it's missing. I guess I can continue like that but it doesn't sound > ideal, so I'm still +1 on Mark's proposal. > > Anyway, Mark Thanks for volunteering to do this. I was hoping it'd take > less than 3 weeks to reach consensus on changes like that which don't > break anything... > -- > Jean-Sebastien > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm still happy to make this change but I held off doing so since there does not seem to be a consensus on the subject at the moment. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
