On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed to all that ONLY IF definitions.xml is going to contain things > related to policies only. Though it is at the present moment my belief is > that it could evolve to represent information more than just policy > related > things. This belief of mine is based on the following : - > > - the name of the file is 'definitions.xml' and is not > 'policy-definitions.xml' > - this is defined in the assembly model specs and not in the PolicyFwk > specs. If its just for policies, I'd reckon that it would have been > defined > completely in the PolicySpecs and only referred to in the Assembly Model > specs. Right now its vice-versa. > > Maybe some Specs folks should give us their perspective on this. > > - Venkat > > Those are good points. Especially the last one as its they that ask for this in an offline discussion so it would be really good to get their input here. ...ant
