On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Laws wrote: > > > snip.... > > > > > > I prefer a branch to make it clear that all in the community can work > > > in > > > it, to make it clear that it's accepted by the project, that it's > > > buildable > > > etc, instead of having work buried in the middle of a sandbox together > > > with > > > obsolete or broken stuff, with an unclear status. > > > > > > > > So you mean a branch for 2.0 (you did say this in your previous post and > > my > > eyes skipped over it) and trunk would remain as 1.x ? > > > > Simon > > > > > It doesn't really make a difference for me: just 2 folders, one for 1.x > one for 2.0, and just make clear which one is which and what's its purpose. > > I'm fine with whatever option people prefer: trunk for 2.0 and > branches/1.x or trunk for 1.x and branches/2.0, or foo/2.0, sandbox/2.0, > whatever keeps our community happy. > > -- > Jean-Sebastien > Given the amount of activity we have going on in trunk at the moment, I would support 1.x remaining as trunk and cutting a branch to allow for more innovative (read breaking) development in a 2.0 code stream. Simon
