On 11/26/2013 12:59 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:01:14AM +0000, Alan Gauld wrote:

Is there a method to compare a substring, without building a substring
>from the big one? Like startswith or endswith, but anywhere inside the
string?
     test = s[1, -1] == "bcd"    # no!, builds a substring

I assume you mean  test = s[1:-1] == "bcd"

     test = s.sub_is(1, -1, "bcd")    # yes! what I'm searching

You can use startswith() (or endswith) by providing the optional
start and end arguments:

test = s.startswith("bcd", 1, -1)

That doesn't work, unfortunately:

py> s = "abcdZZZZZZZ"
py> s[1:-1] == "bcd"
False
py> s.startswith("bcd", 1, -1)
True


Oops.

You'd have to do both startswith() and endswith() tests, and even then
it doesn't work:

py> s = "abcdZZZZZZZZabcde"
py> s[1:-1] == "bcd"
False
py> s.startswith("bcd", 1, -1) and s.endswith("bcd", 1, -1)
True

Hum, I don't understand the reasoning, here.
* First, why use the end-index param? (Here in this case, or in any other)? It contradicts the idea of starting with in my view, but also is useless for sub-equality checking. * Second, imagining we'd like to use it anyway, shouldn't it be adjusted according to the lenth of the checked substring? In other words, why do you use '-1'?

All in all, startswith plus start-index only seems to work fine, I guess. What is wrong? string.find also works (someone suggested it on the python-ideas mailing list) but requires both start- and end- indexes. Also, startswith returns true/false, which is more adequate conceptually for a checking instruction.

spir@ospir:~$ python3
Python 3.3.1 (default, Sep 25 2013, 19:29:01)
[GCC 4.7.3] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
s = "abcde"
s.startswith("bcd", 1)
True
s.find("bcd", 1, 4)
1
s = "abcdefghi"
s.startswith("bcd", 1)
True
s.startswith("bcd", 2)
False
s = "fghiabcde"
s.startswith("bcd", 5)
True
s.startswith("bcd", 1)
False
s.startswith("bcd", 9)
False

I really want to know if I'm missing an obvious logical point, here; else, I will stupidly use startswith, which seems to do the job, and this w/o unduly creating unneeded string objects.

Denis
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist  -  Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor

Reply via email to