When Jon Stewart appeared on "Crossfire," he criticized them, saying "Crossfire" was a great opportunity to get the politicians off their marketing strategy. Yet he allows Cruise to do his marketing strategy unchallenged. As far as claims he has no news pretensions, then why does Stewart focus on the Veterans Administration problems or continue his lame pursuit of some conspiracy about the run up to the Iraq war. Judith Miller easily toppled that conspiracy theory while Stewart left her real journalistic felonies unexamined.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:20 PM, PGage <pga...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Henry Fung <calwa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Cruise has also not been accused of a crime (even by the documentaries, >> which state that while services were procured by the Church to make Cruise >> happy, they don't allege Cruise did anything illegal)... > > > Well, I described this above as: "He has been publicly accused by a credible > source of being a direct party to unsavory, immoral and perhaps illegal > activity". I see the legality of the behavior Cruise is accused of as being > more in question that you apparently do. > > Here is how the Atlantic article describes the episodes in question: > >> "The movie alleges, among other things, that the actor personally profited >> from slave labor (church members who were paid 40 cents an hour to outfit >> the star’s airplane hangar and motorcycle), and that his former girlfriend, >> the actress Nazanin Boniadi, was punished by the Church by being forced to >> do menial work after telling a friend about her relationship troubles with >> Cruise." > > > I do think the author of the Atlantic article is putting the most extreme > interpretation possible on the allegations, but...I also think that, were > the allegations accepted at face value, and were the relevant statutes of > limitation not expired (I don't know about that one way or the other) a > prosecutor so inclined could probably find charges to file against Cruise. > In any event, these are serious issues, that directly involve Cruise, and go > far beyond questions of the form "why do you belong to such a weird > church?", or even "how can you belong to a Church that does bad things?". > > -- > -- > TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "TV or Not TV" group. > To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TVorNotTV" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
