This setting is set to be removed momentarily. Watch blog.twitter.com for
notes about the deprecation when the deploy happens.

You heard it here first.

Thanks,
Doug
--

Doug Williams
Twitter Platform Support
http://twitter.com/dougw


On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Doug Williams <d...@twitter.com> wrote:

> The default is: "show me: @replies to the people that I'm following". The
> vast majority of our users keep this default. If this setting is indeed
> removed this is the behavior we will use.
>
> Note: I will update the thread when/if this setting is axed (even though
> it's not really an API decision) to close the loop.
>
> Thanks,
> Doug
> --
>
> Doug Williams
> Twitter Platform Support
> http://twitter.com/dougw
>
>
> Wait, did the default not used to be "Show all @ replies" (it is the
> first option in the dropdown box)?  Did that change? Personally, I
> like seeing all of them as it leads me to follow new and interesting
> people...
>
> If this goes away, is everyone going to be set to "only show @replies
> to people I follow" ?
> --
> Do you follow me? http://twitter.com/dougw
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:43 PM, voorwiel <voorw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> OK, thanks for the heads up.
>>
>> On May 11, 11:30 pm, Doug Williams <d...@twitter.com> wrote:
>> > We have had a debate internally (today) where we have all but decided to
>> > remove this setting in the near future. I would not create any
>> application
>> > that relied on this. Almost all of our users leave it at the default
>> (only
>> > show @replies to people I follow) so the cost of maintaining the setting
>> > does not translate to value in the product.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Doug
>> > --
>> >
>> > Doug Williams
>> > Twitter Platform Supporthttp://twitter.com/dougw
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:57 PM, voorwiel <voorw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thanks, I'm familiar with the setting.
>> >
>> > > Somehow the setting does not have any effect with the account I'm
>> > > testing with: not when logged in to twitter.com, and not when using
>> > > statuses/friends_timeline. Chad's posting made me do some tests with
>> > > two other accounts: there the setting works as it should.
>> >
>> > > The only difference between the accounts I can think of is that the
>> > > misbehaving account is the one I used when applying for a higher rate
>> > > limit (20,000). Could there be a relation?
>> >
>> > > thanks, Jack
>> >
>> > > On May 11, 8:38 pm, Doug Williams <d...@twitter.com> wrote:
>> > > > There is a setting to change this behavior:
>> >
>> > > >http://help.twitter.com/forums/23786/entries/14595
>> >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > Doug
>> > > > --
>> >
>> > > > Doug Williams
>> > > > Twitter Platform Supporthttp://twitter.com/dougw
>> >
>> > > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Chad Etzel <jazzyc...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> > > > > I'm confused now.  I just pulled my friends_timeline and it is
>> > > > > definitely showing @replies from my friends to people I don't
>> follow.
>> > > > > i.e. I'm getting the "firehose" as it pertains to my
>> > > > > friends_timeline.... are you saying you're not seeing the same
>> thing?
>> >
>> > > > > -Chad
>> >
>> > > > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:36 PM, voorwiel <voorw...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > > > On May 10, 12:00 am, Abraham Williams <4bra...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > >> I would think that statuses/friends_timeline [1] would not be
>> > > effected
>> > > > > by
>> > > > > >> @-reply settings [2]. If it is your only option is to use the
>> search
>> > > > > method
>> > > > > >> you mentioned. The down side of this is protected accounts are
>> not
>> > > > > included.
>> >
>> > > > > > Indeed it isn't affected by the setting. I wonder whether it is
>> a
>> > > > > > policy decision not to include statuses directed at non-friends
>> in
>> > > > > > statuses/friends_timeline. I'm actually hoping that it is not in
>> the
>> > > > > > otherwise excellent documentation simply because someone forgot
>> to
>> > > > > > include it :)
>> >
>> > > > > > greetings, Jack
>>
>
>

Reply via email to