Has nothing to do with anything. Enforce your trademark evenly or don't enforce it at all. Selective enforcement is not allowed.
On Aug 12, 10:57 am, Rich <rhyl...@gmail.com> wrote: > and I'm certain the reason for adding the Twitter name violation in > there in addition to all the others is that they don't want their name > associated with, what is effectively a Web 2.0 spamming operation. > > On Aug 12, 3:55 pm, Duane Roelands <duane.roela...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Are any of these developers -selling- their products? You are. > > Are any of these developers violating the Terms of Service? You are. > > > Just because another website has "Twitter" in the name doesn't make > > their situation the same as yours. > > > You made a tool for spammers. You get caught. Get over it. > > > On Aug 12, 10:14 am, "Dean Collins" <d...@cognation.net> wrote: > > > > So has anyone heard from or know any of the other developers? Did they > > > also get an email last night?
