Harald Welte wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:51:03PM +0200, Detlev Zundel wrote: > >> Even though I'm an enthusiastic Emacs user, I have different reasons for >> my vote. As far as build dependencies go, I'd like to restrict this to >> the LSB standard[1]. Xdd is not in there, so thats why I vote for the >> small C program (unless we can adapt the script and use 'od'). > > I think sticking to LSB for build dependencies is a very reasonable choice. > > I still don't think the small C program is that much of a problem: > > 1) dependency tracking should ensure it is only built when the license > feature is enabled by the board-level config. I think this will be > a minority case. > > 2) compilation of native programs has already to be possible since there > are other native tools such as mkimage built during the compilation > > Cheers,
FWIIW, I agree with Detlev & Harald and withdraw my "bleah" objection. Best regards, gvb ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
