In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:51:03PM +0200, Detlev Zundel wrote:
>
> > Even though I'm an enthusiastic Emacs user, I have different reasons for
> > my vote. As far as build dependencies go, I'd like to restrict this to
> > the LSB standard[1]. Xdd is not in there, so thats why I vote for the
> > small C program (unless we can adapt the script and use 'od').
>
> I think sticking to LSB for build dependencies is a very reasonable choice.
>
> I still don't think the small C program is that much of a problem:
>
> 1) dependency tracking should ensure it is only built when the license
> feature is enabled by the board-level config. I think this will be
> a minority case.
>
> 2) compilation of native programs has already to be possible since there
> are other native tools such as mkimage built during the compilation
I think we have an agreement. We will use the C program.
Now let's go on and do some real work.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Repeat after me:
Usenet is not a word processor; it's a medium where aesthetics count.
Mozilla is not a newsreader; it's a web browser.
Windows is not an operating system; it's a GUI on a program loader.
-- Tom Christiansen in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
