Dear Scott Wood, > On 02/25/2013 05:03:30 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Scott Wood, > > > > > So maybe we need a more general (but optional) CONFIG_BUILD_TARGET. > > > > Can you elaborate? > > Same as CONFIG_SPL_TARGET, but not SPL-specific. Basically a way for a > board config file to add to $(ALL-y). > > > > So each one would set the appropriate CONFIG_BUILD_TARGET for > > > > whatever > > > > > needs to get built, and then something like CONFIG_NAND_IMAGE could > > > hold the image name that should be linked to produce a standard > > > u-boot-nand.bin output. > > > > Yea, sounds reasonable. But why call it CONFIG_ , it can't be stored > > in the > > board.h files, it has to be somewhere in the Makefile hierarchy. > > Why can't it go in the board.h files?
How would a config file contain the CPU-specific portions of a Makefile? > -Scott Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot