On Tuesday 02 April 2013 09:43 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/02/2013 11:33 AM, Sricharan R wrote: >> Hi Tom, >> >> On Tuesday 02 April 2013 12:50 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 09:22:41PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote: >>> >>>> Now with kernel moving to all device tree, the default boot >>>> command is changed to pass the device tree blob. Also, adding >>>> the findfdt command to get the dt-blob based on the board. >>>> >>>> Thanks to Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> for suggesting this. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <r.sricha...@ti.com> >>> [snip] >>>> @@ -145,6 +149,10 @@ "loadaddr=0x82000000\0" \ >>>> "console=ttyO2,115200n8\0" \ "fdt_high=0xffffffff\0" \ + >>>> "fdtaddr=0x80f80000\0" \ + "bootpart=0:1\0" \ + "bootdir=\0" \ >>>> + "bootfile=uImage\0" \ >>> >>> What about 0:2 and /boot, ala am335x_evm as well? I'm not aware >>> of any distributions being really clever and mounting the FAT >>> partition to /boot and I know some that have been expecting and >>> using their ext*-located kernels for a while for various TI >>> platforms. And wer're moving in that latter direction too :) >>> Thanks! >>> >> Sorry, i am not clear here. You mean default partition should be >> '2' and not '1'. why ?. Is there any ordering like FAT-1, EXT2-2, >> etc ? The reason i added 0:1, was we generally have boot FAT as >> partition '1' and directly take images from there, without any >> hierarchies (/boot) > > Right. I'm saying we should be pulling from the Linux filesystem for > our kernel / device tree and move people toward pulling from EXT* > (where the distro or vendor has provided them with a reasonable > kernel, or they've updated their own there) and away from FAT. > ok, get it. Will change then.
Regards, Sricharan _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot