Hi Sricharan, On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 12:44:45 +0530, Sricharan R <r.sricha...@ti.com> wrote:
> Hi Albert, > > On Friday 05 April 2013 12:36 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > Hi Sricharan, > > > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 11:24:34 +0530, Sricharan R <r.sricha...@ti.com> > > wrote: > > > >> So with OMAP added to multi platform kernel, > >> the uImage no more contains a valid load address. > >> With the uboot already supporting zImage, > >> change the default boot command to bootz > >> instead. > >> > >> Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <n...@ti.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <r.sricha...@ti.com> > >> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <n...@ti.com> > >> --- > >> include/configs/omap4_common.h | 4 ++-- > >> include/configs/omap5_common.h | 4 ++-- > >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > Is there a reason why this patch does not have history? > > > > Amicalement, > I had a minor change only in these two from the series. > So reposted only these two with 'in-reply-to' threads. > If this is not the right etiquette, then should it be > update/appended in the original patch ? My question is not about the series but only about 5/5 which has no patch history after the commit message delimiter (---) whereas 4/5 has history. If 5/5 has a minor change in V4, then it should have a history log indicating which minor change it was. > Regards, > Sricharan Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot