On Friday 05 April 2013 01:38 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Sricharan, > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 12:44:45 +0530, Sricharan R <r.sricha...@ti.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Albert, >> >> On Friday 05 April 2013 12:36 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >>> Hi Sricharan, >>> >>> On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 11:24:34 +0530, Sricharan R <r.sricha...@ti.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> So with OMAP added to multi platform kernel, >>>> the uImage no more contains a valid load address. >>>> With the uboot already supporting zImage, >>>> change the default boot command to bootz >>>> instead. >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <n...@ti.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <r.sricha...@ti.com> >>>> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <n...@ti.com> >>>> --- >>>> include/configs/omap4_common.h | 4 ++-- >>>> include/configs/omap5_common.h | 4 ++-- >>>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>> >>> Is there a reason why this patch does not have history? >>> >>> Amicalement, >> I had a minor change only in these two from the series. >> So reposted only these two with 'in-reply-to' threads. >> If this is not the right etiquette, then should it be >> update/appended in the original patch ? > > My question is not about the series but only about 5/5 which has > no patch history after the commit message delimiter (---) whereas 4/5 > has history. > > If 5/5 has a minor change in V4, then it should have a history log > indicating which minor change it was. > ok. 5/5 was just rebase on 4/5. Will add it though. Sorry for the miss.
Regards, Sricharan _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
