Hello Benoît, On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:56:00 +0100, Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit.thebaudeau....@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Dave Kucharczyk, > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:08 PM, DaveKucharczyk > <david.kucharc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Fabio Estevam-2 wrote > >> Also, you said that your 512MB board version works fine, but the 256MB > >> fails. > >> > >> I suppose you are using two different binaries for each board, right? > >> You can't have a single binary for the two boards, unless you use the > >> SPL approach. > > > > Fabio, we use one binary. It has runtime memory discovery via gpio's > > (resistor reads). DRAM size is reported correctly from both boards. It just > > hangs on the 256MB board. > > > > We do not have SPL setup. > > You should try with 2015.01 as Fabio suggested. > > Also, check the CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE of your board. From your log, I'm > wondering if it's not set too high, resulting in an overlap of the > pre- and post-relocation addresses occupied by your binary in the > 256-MiB case.
/me wonders whether we should not add a test for this situation, with a conspicuous error message on the console stating that relocation will probably fail due to overlap. > Best regards, > Benoît Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
