On 2017-06-12 01:51, Esponde, Joel wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > Why did you take the value 0x20 in the table entry instead of the > value 0x00 as it is, for example, in the NXP U-Boot?
0x00 would mean b0000, which is WEIM (OneNAND/NOR flash, which is probably a likely boot device). 0x20 is no defined boot device, and since it works, it will make sure that bmode usb works for all users of i.MX 6UL/ULL... -- Stefan > > Is it because this boot mode does not exist in the iMX6UL SOC? > > Joël Esponde > Honeywell | Safety and Productivity Solutions > >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : Fabio Estevam [mailto:feste...@gmail.com] >> Envoyé : samedi 10 juin 2017 00:10 >> À : Stefan Agner <ste...@agner.ch>; Esponde, Joel >> <joel.espo...@honeywell.com> >> Cc : Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de>; Fabio Estevam >> <fabio.este...@nxp.com>; Stefan Agner <stefan.ag...@toradex.com>; U- >> Boot-Denx <u-boot@lists.denx.de> >> Objet : Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx6ull: fix USB bmode for i.MX 6UL and >> 6ULL >> >> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Stefan Agner <ste...@agner.ch> wrote: >> > From: Stefan Agner <stefan.ag...@toradex.com> >> > >> > i.MX 6UL and 6ULL have different boot device capabilities and use >> > therefor use a different boot device selection table than other i.MX 6 >> > devices. Particularly, the value which has been used so far (b0001) is >> > assigned to QSPI boot for these two devices. >> > >> > There is no common reserved value for all i.MX 6devices. Use >> > b0010 for i.MX 6UL and 6ULL via compile time ifdef. >> > >> > Reported-by: Joël Esponde <joel.espo...@honeywell.com> >> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan.ag...@toradex.com> >> >> Thanks for the patch. >> >> Joël, could you please test it and reply with your Tested-by? >> >> Thanks _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot