Hi Stefan,

On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 03:53:08PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
Hi Ralph,

On 09.09.20 15:49, Ralph Siemsen wrote:

Very good, I will send a separate patch that adds a Kconfig option.

As it turns out, doing a separate patch for this gets messy, and also would introduce a dependency between the patches. Will do v3 instead.

Small procedural question: Patchwork is showing state=new for both versions of the mtest fix [1]. Is this normal, or did I miss some step when posting the v2 patch?

The only thing you missed, was adding my RB tag to v2. I did send a new
RB again to this mail, so patchwork will collect it automatically.

Thanks, I was not entirely clear what the policy was for this. Presumably there is a way for a reviewer to 'revoke' the RB in case they disagree with subsequent changes?

You could mark your v1 as superseded in patchwork though.

Seems somebody beat me to it, v1 is now marked as superseded.

Ralph

Reply via email to