Hi Ralph,
On 09.09.20 17:07, Ralph Siemsen wrote:
Hi Stefan,
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 03:53:08PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
Hi Ralph,
On 09.09.20 15:49, Ralph Siemsen wrote:
Very good, I will send a separate patch that adds a Kconfig option.
As it turns out, doing a separate patch for this gets messy, and also
would introduce a dependency between the patches. Will do v3 instead.
Okay.
Small procedural question: Patchwork is showing state=new for both
versions of the mtest fix [1]. Is this normal, or did I miss some
step when posting the v2 patch?
The only thing you missed, was adding my RB tag to v2. I did send a new
RB again to this mail, so patchwork will collect it automatically.
Thanks, I was not entirely clear what the policy was for this.
Presumably there is a way for a reviewer to 'revoke' the RB in case they
disagree with subsequent changes?
Usually the RB is only added, when not too many further changes are
made by the committer. There is no strict rule here AFAIK.
You could mark your v1 as superseded in patchwork though.
Seems somebody beat me to it, v1 is now marked as superseded.
Tom is quite active here. ;)
Thanks,
Stefan
