Hi Tim,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] imx: mkimage_fit_atf: replace @ with hyphen
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 12:17 PM Heiko Thiery <heiko.thi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Am Mi., 5. Mai 2021 um 15:30 Uhr schrieb ZHIZHIKIN Andrey
> > <andrey.zhizhi...@leica-geosystems.com>:
> > >
> > > Hello Oliver,
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: U-Boot <u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de> On Behalf Of Oliver
> > > > Graute
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 2:01 PM
> > > > To: sba...@denx.de
> > > > Cc: feste...@gmail.com; peng....@nxp.com;
> > > > oliver.gra...@kococonnector.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Simon Glass
> > > > <s...@chromium.org>; uboot-imx <uboot-...@nxp.com>
> > > > Subject: [PATCH v1] imx: mkimage_fit_atf: replace @ with hyphen
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Unit addresses are not allowed anymore in a FIT image since
> > > >
> > > > commit 3f04db891a35 ("image: Check for unit addresses in FITs")
> > > >
> > > > This caused this error on mkimage creation:
> > > >
> > > > ./tools/mkimage: verify_header failed for FIT Image support with
> > > > exit code 1
> > > > Makefile:1393: recipe for target 'u-boot.itb' failed
> > > > make: *** [u-boot.itb] Error 1
> >
> > This error is still present in the current master branch and the
> > target "flash.bin" does not not build anymore for the
> > imx8mq_evk_defconfig.
> >
> > Any thoughts to apply this patch to master?
> >
>
> Heiko,
>
> I just ran into this failure as well with imx8mm_venice_defconfig which I
> haven't moved to binman yet.
>
> With respect to moving to binman, I'm all for it but I'm wondering why other
> boards have elected to move from a monolithic flash.bin including the SPL and
> u-boot.itb pre-binman to post-binman where flash.bin is just the SPL. I'm not
> sure why users should be hit with a change like that... why are people not
> having binman produce a flash.bin that was equivalent to pre-binman?
You mean flash.bin not contain u-boot.bin when using binman here?
Regards,
Peng.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tim
