Hi Tim, [Adding Marek]
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 6:53 PM Tim Harvey <thar...@gateworks.com> wrote: > With respect to moving to binman, I'm all for it but I'm wondering why > other boards have elected to move from a monolithic flash.bin > including the SPL and u-boot.itb pre-binman to post-binman where > flash.bin is just the SPL. I'm not sure why users should be hit with a > change like that... why are people not having binman produce a > flash.bin that was equivalent to pre-binman? Yes, fully agree. Peng, After the adoption of binman, both flash.bin and u-boot.itb need to be flashed to the boot media. This breaks user experience, distro integration, etc, which is not good. Can we have binman generate a single bootable flash.bin binary (which contains flash.bin + u-boot.itb) again to keep compatibility and avoid breakage? Thanks, Fabio Estevam > > Best regards, > > Tim
