Hi all, Am Mo., 2. Aug. 2021 um 11:57 Uhr schrieb Peng Fan (OSS) <peng....@oss.nxp.com>: > > Hi Tim, > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] imx: mkimage_fit_atf: replace @ with hyphen > > > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 12:17 PM Heiko Thiery <heiko.thi...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Am Mi., 5. Mai 2021 um 15:30 Uhr schrieb ZHIZHIKIN Andrey > > > <andrey.zhizhi...@leica-geosystems.com>: > > > > > > > > Hello Oliver, > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: U-Boot <u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de> On Behalf Of Oliver > > > > > Graute > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 2:01 PM > > > > > To: sba...@denx.de > > > > > Cc: feste...@gmail.com; peng....@nxp.com; > > > > > oliver.gra...@kococonnector.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Simon Glass > > > > > <s...@chromium.org>; uboot-imx <uboot-...@nxp.com> > > > > > Subject: [PATCH v1] imx: mkimage_fit_atf: replace @ with hyphen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unit addresses are not allowed anymore in a FIT image since > > > > > > > > > > commit 3f04db891a35 ("image: Check for unit addresses in FITs") > > > > > > > > > > This caused this error on mkimage creation: > > > > > > > > > > ./tools/mkimage: verify_header failed for FIT Image support with > > > > > exit code 1 > > > > > Makefile:1393: recipe for target 'u-boot.itb' failed > > > > > make: *** [u-boot.itb] Error 1 > > > > > > This error is still present in the current master branch and the > > > target "flash.bin" does not not build anymore for the > > > imx8mq_evk_defconfig. > > > > > > Any thoughts to apply this patch to master? > > > > > > > Heiko, > > > > I just ran into this failure as well with imx8mm_venice_defconfig which I > > haven't moved to binman yet. > > > > With respect to moving to binman, I'm all for it but I'm wondering why other > > boards have elected to move from a monolithic flash.bin including the SPL > > and > > u-boot.itb pre-binman to post-binman where flash.bin is just the SPL. I'm > > not > > sure why users should be hit with a change like that... why are people not > > having binman produce a flash.bin that was equivalent to pre-binman? > > You mean flash.bin not contain u-boot.bin when using binman here?
Any news on that? I just see that in the current master it is not possible to create a working flash.bin for e.g. the imx8mq_evk board. -- Heiko