On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:26 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Becky Bruce <bec...@kernel.crashing.org> 
> wrote:
>> This is for boards that use the SDRAM mode on the LBC but don't
>> require any additional setup.
>> 
>> I'm merging all the initdram() calls into a single function for 85xx,
>> and have to be able to distinguish between boards that require an
>> sdram_init() function, and those that do not.  We could have defined
>> an empty sdram_init() but I hate doing that.
> 
> Would a weak function be a better way to do this?

Eeney meeney meiney mo.....  If the peanut gallery prefers, I can go that way.  
I don't actually like either solution very much.

-B
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to