On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:26 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Becky Bruce <bec...@kernel.crashing.org> > wrote: >> This is for boards that use the SDRAM mode on the LBC but don't >> require any additional setup. >> >> I'm merging all the initdram() calls into a single function for 85xx, >> and have to be able to distinguish between boards that require an >> sdram_init() function, and those that do not. We could have defined >> an empty sdram_init() but I hate doing that. > > Would a weak function be a better way to do this?
Eeney meeney meiney mo..... If the peanut gallery prefers, I can go that way. I don't actually like either solution very much. -B _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot