On Dec 3, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Becky Bruce wrote: > > On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:26 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Becky Bruce <bec...@kernel.crashing.org> >> wrote: >>> This is for boards that use the SDRAM mode on the LBC but don't >>> require any additional setup. >>> >>> I'm merging all the initdram() calls into a single function for 85xx, >>> and have to be able to distinguish between boards that require an >>> sdram_init() function, and those that do not. We could have defined >>> an empty sdram_init() but I hate doing that. >> >> Would a weak function be a better way to do this? > > Eeney meeney meiney mo..... If the peanut gallery prefers, I can go that > way. I don't actually like either solution very much.
I'd prefer reduce the number of #defines - k _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
