Hi again Andre,
On 12/5/22 17:45, Andre Przywara wrote:
+static struct ccu_clk_gate d1_gates[] = {
+ [CLK_BUS_MMC0] = GATE(0x84c, BIT(0)),
+ [CLK_BUS_MMC1] = GATE(0x84c, BIT(1)),
+ [CLK_BUS_MMC2] = GATE(0x84c, BIT(2)),
+ [CLK_BUS_UART0] = GATE(0x90c, BIT(0)),
+ [CLK_BUS_UART1] = GATE(0x90c, BIT(1)),
+ [CLK_BUS_UART2] = GATE(0x90c, BIT(2)),
+ [CLK_BUS_UART3] = GATE(0x90c, BIT(3)),
+ [CLK_BUS_UART4] = GATE(0x90c, BIT(4)),
+ [CLK_BUS_UART5] = GATE(0x90c, BIT(5)),
+ [CLK_BUS_I2C0] = GATE(0x91c, BIT(0)),
+ [CLK_BUS_I2C1] = GATE(0x91c, BIT(1)),
+ [CLK_BUS_I2C2] = GATE(0x91c, BIT(2)),
+ [CLK_BUS_I2C3] = GATE(0x91c, BIT(3)),
+ [CLK_SPI0] = GATE(0x940, BIT(31)),
+ [CLK_SPI1] = GATE(0x944, BIT(31)),
+ [CLK_BUS_SPI0] = GATE(0x96c, BIT(0)),
+ [CLK_BUS_SPI1] = GATE(0x96c, BIT(1)),
+
+ [CLK_BUS_EMAC] = GATE(0x97c, BIT(0)),
+
+ [CLK_USB_OHCI0] = GATE(0xa70, BIT(31)),
+ [CLK_USB_OHCI1] = GATE(0xa74, BIT(31)),
+ [CLK_BUS_OHCI0] = GATE(0xa8c, BIT(0)),
+ [CLK_BUS_OHCI1] = GATE(0xa8c, BIT(1)),
+ [CLK_BUS_EHCI0] = GATE(0xa8c, BIT(4)),
+ [CLK_BUS_EHCI1] = GATE(0xa8c, BIT(5)),
+ [CLK_BUS_OTG] = GATE(0xa8c, BIT(8)),
+ [CLK_BUS_LRADC] = GATE(0xa9c, BIT(0)),
+
+ [CLK_RISCV] = GATE(0xd04, BIT(31)),
+};
Would it be reasonable to add (possibly one for APB1 also):
[CLK_APB0] = GATE_DUMMY,
...in order to suppress this warning at init:
sunxi_set_gate: (CLK#24) unhandled
As I understand it, CLK_APB0 is only for speed control and doesn't have
a gate, but since the FDT references it, other drivers are asking the
clock driver to ungate it, resulting in that (safe-to-ignore) warning.
Warm regards,
Sam
PS: Do you have any plans for PSCI support, so we can get the second
core up too? I'd like to patch that in and include it in your series
once my available time permits. Just thought I'd check that you/someone
wasn't working on it already. :)
