Aneesh, On Monday, February 28, 2011 5:16 PM, V, Aneesh wrote: > From: John Rigby <john.ri...@linaro.org> > > Signed-off-by: John Rigby <john.ri...@linaro.org> > --- > common/image.c | 1 + > include/image.h | 1 + > tools/Makefile | 2 + > tools/mkimage.c | 2 + > tools/mkimage.h | 1 + > tools/omapimage.c | 229 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tools/omapimage.h | 50 ++++++++++++ 7 files changed, 286 > insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 > tools/omapimage.c create mode 100644 tools/omapimage.h
As pointed in the RFC[1] which was posted by John, we should separate out the configuration header part as that is optional. We should also consider renaming it to make it generic. What do you think? Regards, Vaibhav [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/91511/focus=91808 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
