On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav <vaibhav.be...@ti.com> wrote: > Aneesh, > > On Monday, February 28, 2011 5:16 PM, V, Aneesh wrote: >> From: John Rigby <john.ri...@linaro.org> >> >> Signed-off-by: John Rigby <john.ri...@linaro.org> >> --- >> common/image.c | 1 + >> include/image.h | 1 + >> tools/Makefile | 2 + >> tools/mkimage.c | 2 + >> tools/mkimage.h | 1 + >> tools/omapimage.c | 229 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> tools/omapimage.h | 50 ++++++++++++ 7 files changed, 286 >> insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 >> tools/omapimage.c create mode 100644 tools/omapimage.h > > As pointed in the RFC[1] which was posted by John, we should separate out the > configuration header part as that is optional. We should also consider > renaming > it to make it generic. What do you think? > Vaibhav,
If you submit a patch that does this I will gladly ack it. John _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot