Dear Valentin Longchamp,
In message
<c5ba4fd44d7260d169b924ddda97c4a4c7460dd5.1302272395.git.valentin.longch...@keymile.com>
you wrote:
> From: Holger Brunck <holger.bru...@keymile.com>
>
> This patch rename mgcoge2ne board support to mgcoge3ne.
> The board is similar to mgcoge. The difference is that
> a NUMONYX flash is used and a larger SDRAM (256MB).
> Also introduce CONFIG_KM_82XX to collect ppc82xx common
> settings.
I understand this is just a rename, but I want to ask anyway: if flash
type and RAM size are the only differences, then why do we need two
separate board definitions here?
Would not even the same U-Boot binary image run on both boards? These
flashes are CFI compatible, so the CFI driver would work on both, and
RAM size autodetection has been available in U-Boot forever.
In worst case, we coul differentiate boards by an additional #define,
which means we only need a single line entry in boards.cfg.
Why do we need to support two board entries?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
Military secrets are the most fleeting of all.
-- Spock, "The Enterprise Incident", stardate 5027.4
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
