On 05/02/2011 10:42 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Holger Brunck, > > In message <4dbe6962.1010...@keymile.com> you wrote: >> >> the SDRAM configuration is different to mgcoge. And the CFI flash on mgcoge >> has >> a dual die in a single chip and therefore e.g.CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS is >> different to mgcoge3ne. > > OK, but these can trivially be handled within one set of board files. >
with a lot of #ifdef MGCOGE3NE in one config file or do I misunderstand something? >> Additionaly some functional differences are part of the board support, this >> is >> added later on. E.g. mgcoge3ne is part of mgcoge3 which has two processors >> deployed and there are some connections between the processors via GPIOs >> which >> are not present on mgcoge. So in my opinion an additional board suport is >> reasonable in this case. > > Well, it's your board and you have to maintain it in the long run, but > I'm not convinced that this is a wise decision. > So your proposal would be to do something like mgcoge powerpc mpc8260 km82xx keymile - mgcoge3ne:MGCOGE3NE,... in boards.cfg and only one config file for both boards? Best regards Holger Brunck _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot