Dear Holger Brunck,
In message <4dbe6962.1010...@keymile.com> you wrote:
>
> the SDRAM configuration is different to mgcoge. And the CFI flash on mgcoge
> has
> a dual die in a single chip and therefore e.g.CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS is
> different to mgcoge3ne.
OK, but these can trivially be handled within one set of board files.
> Additionaly some functional differences are part of the board support, this is
> added later on. E.g. mgcoge3ne is part of mgcoge3 which has two processors
> deployed and there are some connections between the processors via GPIOs which
> are not present on mgcoge. So in my opinion an additional board suport is
> reasonable in this case.
Well, it's your board and you have to maintain it in the long run, but
I'm not convinced that this is a wise decision.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
There is a multi-legged creature crawling on your shoulder.
-- Spock, "A Taste of Armageddon", stardate 3193.9
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
