Refactor two identical functions for getting mux clock rates. The
functions are renamed and moved to the section of the code that contains
other common functions.

Signed-off-by: David Lechner <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c | 50 ++++++++++++++----------------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c
index c65230a7f9b..c5f6d45fd67 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c
@@ -253,6 +253,21 @@ static ulong mtk_find_parent_rate(struct mtk_clk_priv 
*priv, struct clk *clk,
        return mtk_clk_find_parent_rate(clk, parent, parent_dev);
 }
 
+static ulong mtk_clk_mux_get_rate(struct clk *clk, u32 off)
+{
+       struct mtk_clk_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(clk->dev);
+       const struct mtk_composite *mux = &priv->tree->muxes[off];
+       const struct mtk_parent *parent;
+       u32 index;
+
+       index = readl(priv->base + mux->mux_reg);
+       index &= mux->mux_mask << mux->mux_shift;
+       index = index >> mux->mux_shift;
+       parent = &mux->parent[index];
+
+       return mtk_find_parent_rate(priv, clk, parent->id, parent->flags);
+}
+
 static int mtk_clk_mux_set_parent(void __iomem *base, u32 parent,
                                  u32 parent_type,
                                  const struct mtk_composite *mux)
@@ -701,21 +716,6 @@ static ulong mtk_topckgen_get_factor_rate(struct clk *clk, 
u32 off)
        return mtk_factor_recalc_rate(fdiv, rate);
 }
 
-static ulong mtk_topckgen_get_mux_rate(struct clk *clk, u32 off)
-{
-       struct mtk_clk_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(clk->dev);
-       const struct mtk_composite *mux = &priv->tree->muxes[off];
-       const struct mtk_parent *parent;
-       u32 index;
-
-       index = readl(priv->base + mux->mux_reg);
-       index &= mux->mux_mask << mux->mux_shift;
-       index = index >> mux->mux_shift;
-       parent = &mux->parent[index];
-
-       return mtk_find_parent_rate(priv, clk, parent->id, parent->flags);
-}
-
 static ulong mtk_topckgen_get_rate(struct clk *clk)
 {
        struct mtk_clk_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(clk->dev);
@@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ static ulong mtk_topckgen_get_rate(struct clk *clk)
                return mtk_topckgen_get_factor_rate(clk, clk->id - 
tree->fdivs_offs);
 
        if (mtk_clk_id_is_mux(tree, clk->id))
-               return mtk_topckgen_get_mux_rate(clk, clk->id - 
tree->muxes_offs);
+               return mtk_clk_mux_get_rate(clk, clk->id - tree->muxes_offs);
 
        if (mtk_clk_id_is_gate(tree, clk->id)) {
                const struct mtk_gate *gate = &tree->gates[clk->id - 
tree->gates_offs];
@@ -959,21 +959,6 @@ static ulong mtk_infrasys_get_factor_rate(struct clk *clk, 
u32 off)
        return mtk_factor_recalc_rate(fdiv, rate);
 }
 
-static ulong mtk_infrasys_get_mux_rate(struct clk *clk, u32 off)
-{
-       struct mtk_clk_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(clk->dev);
-       const struct mtk_composite *mux = &priv->tree->muxes[off];
-       const struct mtk_parent *parent;
-       u32 index;
-
-       index = readl(priv->base + mux->mux_reg);
-       index &= mux->mux_mask << mux->mux_shift;
-       index = index >> mux->mux_shift;
-       parent = &mux->parent[index];
-
-       return mtk_find_parent_rate(priv, clk, parent->id, parent->flags);
-}
-
 static ulong mtk_infrasys_get_rate(struct clk *clk)
 {
        struct mtk_clk_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(clk->dev);
@@ -986,8 +971,7 @@ static ulong mtk_infrasys_get_rate(struct clk *clk)
                                                    priv->tree->fdivs_offs);
        /* No gates defined or ID is a MUX */
        } else if (!mtk_clk_id_is_gate(priv->tree, clk->id)) {
-               rate = mtk_infrasys_get_mux_rate(clk, clk->id -
-                                                priv->tree->muxes_offs);
+               rate = mtk_clk_mux_get_rate(clk, clk->id - 
priv->tree->muxes_offs);
        /* Only valid with muxes + gates implementation */
        } else {
                struct udevice *parent = NULL;

-- 
2.43.0

Reply via email to