Hi Stephen, On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> wrote: > On 11/23/2011 08:54 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> This was taken from commit 1ea6b8f at: >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/olof/tegra.git > > That's not the latest version in linux-next. Also, this doesn't include > quite a few changes that have been sent to the mailing lists but not yet > applied.
OK I see a newer version in 'next' that now has USB so have picked that up. I picked 'master' originally. > > In particular, linux-next now includes a minimal USB binding. Should we > just use this in U-Boot for now? We should get review on the kernel > lists before bringing in this more advanced USB binding in U-Boot, and > perhaps even add the binding into the kernel at the same time? I copied my email to the device-tree mailing list. Hopefully that is enough to get a review there. It feels wrong to send U-Boot patches to the kernel list...? > > Patches have been posted to: > * Convert to the finalized ARM GIC binding. > * Disable devices in the per-board .dts files that aren't used on those > boards. > * Various other cleanups in order to make the .dts files match the > kernel's non-DT board files. > * Perhaps more that I forget. Well I would prefer to pick these up when they are actually applied! > > I suppose those could be applied to U-Boot as and when they are applied > to the kernel. Yes I think so. Regards, Simon > > -- > nvpublic > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot