On 12/01/2011 06:24 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> wrote: >> On 11/23/2011 08:54 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >>> This was taken from commit 1ea6b8f at: >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/olof/tegra.git >> ... >> In particular, linux-next now includes a minimal USB binding. Should we >> just use this in U-Boot for now? We should get review on the kernel >> lists before bringing in this more advanced USB binding in U-Boot, and >> perhaps even add the binding into the kernel at the same time? > > I copied my email to the device-tree mailing list. Hopefully that is > enough to get a review there. It feels wrong to send U-Boot patches to > the kernel list...?
I think the kernel and U-boot need to co-ordinate on the DT bindings. Posting at least to linux-tegra, the Tegra maintainers, and perhaps even the kernel's domain-specific list (i.e. linux-usb) seems appropriate to me. DT is a cross-functional thing, and really needs cross-functional discussion and review. devicetree-discuss will cover the DT experts, but probably not the CPU and subsystem experts. -- nvpublic _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
